Current Legislation

On December 9, 2009 a chaining and tethering Bill was prefiled in the South Caolina Senate.  

This bill is sponsored by both Senator Knotts and Senator Davis.  Senator Knotts had introduced a bill last year restricting chaining and tethering. 

 Please read the bill below for your information. We encourage you to make contact with your representatives to show your support for this change.  

 
 

This bill has been sent to the Agriculture and Natural Resource Committee
Both Knotts and Davis are on this same Committee.
 
Agriculture and Natural Resources

 

Verdin, Daniel B. “Danny” III, Chm. Grooms, Lawrence K. “Larry” Leventis, Phil P.
Matthews, John W. , Jr. McGill, J. Yancey Hutto, C. Bradley
Elliott, Dick Knotts, John M. “Jake” , Jr. Bryant, Kevin L.
Campsen, George E. “Chip” III Williams, Kent M. Campbell, Paul G. , Jr.
Sheheen, Vincent A. Bright, Lee Davis, Tom
Mulvaney, J. Michael “Mick” Rose, Michael T.

S 958 

 S 0958 General Bill, By Knotts and Davis
A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION
47-1-45 SO AS TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY CONFINE OR
RESTRAIN AN ANIMAL IN A CRUEL MANNER OR KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY CAUSE SUCH
CRUEL CONFINEMENT OR RESTRAINING OF AN ANIMAL, TO DEFINE CERTAIN TERMS IN
REGARD TO THE ABOVE, TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND TO PROVIDE THAT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MAY ADOPT MORE STRINGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES GOVERNING THE
CONFINEMENT OR RESTRAINING OF AN ANIMAL WITH CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS.

   12/09/09  Senate Prefiled
   12/09/09  Senate Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Natural
                     Resources


  

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

12/9/2009


S. 958 

A BILLTO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 47-1-45 SO AS TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY CONFINE OR RESTRAIN AN ANIMAL IN A CRUEL MANNER OR KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY CAUSE SUCH CRUEL CONFINEMENT OR RESTRAINING OF AN ANIMAL, TO DEFINE CERTAIN TERMS IN REGARD TO THE ABOVE, TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND TO PROVIDE THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MAY ADOPT MORE STRINGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES GOVERNING THE CONFINEMENT OR RESTRAINING OF AN ANIMAL WITH CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS.Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:SECTION    1.    Chapter 1, Title 47 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:”Section 47-1-45.    (A)    It is unlawful to knowingly or intentionally confine or restrain an animal in a cruel manner or knowingly or intentionally cause such cruel confinement or restraining of an animal.(B)    For purposes of this section:(1)    ‘Confine an animal in a cruel manner’ or ‘cruel confinement of an animal’ means confining an animal by means of a pen or similar confinement under circumstances in which the person intends to endanger the animal’s health or safety, or the person reasonably should have known would endanger the animal’s health or safety. ‘Confine an animal in a cruel manner’ or ‘cruel confinement of an animal’ includes, but is not limited to, a confinement that:(a)    confines an animal for such an unreasonable period of time that the animal’s health or safety is endangered;(b)    does not permit an animal to stand, turn around, sit, and lie down in a normal position;(c)    causes bodily injury to an animal;(d)    does not permit an animal access to sustenance;(e)    does not permit proper ventilation for an animal; or(f)    is not kept in a sanitary condition.(2)    ‘Restrain an animal in a cruel manner’ or ‘cruel restraining of an animal’ means tethering, fastening, chaining, tying, attaching, or otherwise restraining an animal to a tree, fence, post, or other stationary object or a running line, pulley, cable trolley system, or similar system by means of a chain, rope, tether, leash, cable, or similar restraint under circumstances in which the person intends to endanger the animal’s health or safety, or the person reasonably should have known would endanger the animal’s health or safety. ‘Restrain an animal in a cruel manner’ or ‘cruel restraining of an animal’ includes, but is not limited to, a restraint that:(a)    restricts an animal’s movement for such an unreasonable period of time that the animal’s health or safety is endangered;(b)    is of a weight that excessively burdens an animal;(c)    causes an animal to choke or causes bodily injury to an animal;(d)    is too short for an animal to move around or for an animal to urinate or defecate in a separate area from the area where the animal must eat, drink, or lie down;(e)    is situated such that an animal will likely become entangled;(f)    does not permit an animal access to sustenance and shelter;(g)    does not permit an animal to escape reasonably foreseeable harm;(h)    is attached to an animal by means of a collar, harness, or similar device that is not properly fitted for the age and size of the animal such that the collar, harness, or similar device causes trauma or injury to the animal; or(i)        is attached to an unsupervised animal by means of a choke-type or pronged collar.(C)    A person who knowingly or intentionally violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be punished by imprisonment not exceeding sixty days or by a fine not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars, or both, for a first offense; by imprisonment not exceeding ninety days or by a fine not exceeding eight hundred dollars, or both, for a second offense; or by imprisonment not exceeding two years or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, or both, for a third or subsequent offense. A person may be issued a correction warning in lieu of being charged with a violation of this section requiring the person to correct the cruel confinement or restraining of an animal within seventy-two hours unless the violation endangers the health or safety of the animal, the animal has been wounded as a result of the violation, or a correction warning has previously been issued to the person.(D)    This section does not apply to fowl, accepted animal husbandry practices of farm operations and the training of animals, animal exhibitions or shows, pet shops, the practice of veterinary medicine, agricultural practices, forestry and silvacultural practices, wildlife management practices, and to activities, exhibitions, transportation, and other events related to activities authorized by Title 50.(E)    Nothing in this section prohibits local governments from adopting more stringent local ordinances governing the confinement or restraining of an animal; however, a local government may assess only civil penalties for such ordinances.”SECTION    2.    This act takes effect on July 1, 2010.

—-XX—- 

  

 

 

  

Currently 5 states have banned or regulated chaining in their animal protection ordinances. South Carolina has a bill (S 833) in the works to pass a statewide law regulating chaining. 95 communities in the U.S. have already passed chaining ordinances

 

Statewide Laws
California Texas West Virginia
Connecticut Virginia  
 
Communities that Prohibit Chaining
Fayetteville, Arkansas Chatham County, Georgia Ronoke Rapids, North Carolina
Maumelle, Arkansas New Orleans, Louisiana Lawton, Oklahoma
Tuscon, Arizona Carthage, Missouri Simpsonville, South Carolina
Okaloosa, Florida New Hanover, North Carolina Austin, Texas
    Big Spring, Texas
    Electra, Texas
     
Communities that Limit Chaining by Time
North Little Rock, AR Lawrence, Kansas Wildwood, New Jersey
Los Angeles, CA Leavenworth, Kansas Wildwood Crest, NJ
Kern County, CA Overland Park, Kansas Canandaigua, NY
San Bernardino,CA Topeka, Kansas Albuquerque, NM
Denver, Colorado Wichita, Kansas Laurinburg, NC
Dania, Florida Jefferson County, KY Scotland County, NC
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Louisville, Kentucky North Royalton, Ohio
Hollywood, Florida Baker, Louisiana Bartlesville, OK
Oakland Park, Florida East Longmeadow, MA Multnomah County, OR
West Palm Beach, FL Carroll County, Maryland Beaufort, South Carolina
Orange County, Florida Battle Creek, Michigan Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Pembroke Park, FL St. Paul, Minnesota Northampton County, VA
DeKalb Cty, Georgia Creve Coeur, Missouri Norfolk, Virginia
Bloomington, Indiana Laurinburg, NC Smithfield, Virginia
Indianapolis, Indiana Camden, New Jersey Virginia Beach, Virginia
Marion, Indiana Lower Township, NJ Linn, Wisconsin
Dodge City, Kansas Ocean City, NJ Racine, Wisconsin
  Sea Isle City, NJ  
     
Communities that protect animals other than dogs
Tucson, Arizona Allen, Texas  
Southhaven, Mississippi Waco, Texas  
Raytown, Missouri    

Comments are closed.