News….
Animal-rights supporters push for no-kill county shelter
By MARTI COVINGTON
mcovington@beaufortgazette.com 843-706-8147 Published Saturday, November 7, 2009
The Beaufort County Animal Shelter euthanized 3,876 of the 5,604 animals it took in last year — some feral, some too aggressive or too sick to be adopted and others casualtiesof tight space and scarce resources. That statistic alarms animal-rights advocates countywide. They want to see the county transition to a no-kill shelter and seek support for their cause, though they have yet to work out how much it would cost or how the shelter would operate. “What drew me to it was actually seeing the numbers,” said County Councilman Rick Caporale, who represents Hilton Head Island and is one of the advocates for a no-kill shelter. The Hilton Head Humane Association already operates a no-kill shelter on the island, and Caporale said he has adopted several pets there through the years. “I think I always felt the animals were in pretty good shape,” he said. “When I got on council, one of the things that shocked me was seeing the monthly reports from the animal shelter. We would take in 500 to 600 animals a month, and we’d kill 400 of them. I thought, ‘My God, that’s horrendous.” Nationwide, several animal rights groups are coming to the same conclusion. Both the Humane Society of the United States and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animalshave launched campaigns encouraging communities to start or switch to no-kill shelters. “This is not a money issue,” Caporale said. “This is a matter of values.” When an animal arrives at the county shelter Toni Lytton, director of Beaufort County Animal Control and Shelter, said her staff values the lives of every animal they handlebut can only do so much in a facility that has enough cages for just 48 adult dogs and 68 adult cats. Volunteers willing to foster sick animals until they can be spayed, neutered and adopted are hard to find, she said, as are those willing to adopt. “People always say, ‘Yeah, you’re the killers,’” Lytton said. “We love the animals. That’s why we work here. Everybody’s always thrilled when we have animals that we don’t have to put to sleep, but the euthanasia is just part of the job.” When a stray, friendly animal is taken in, shelter staff house and feed the animal three days before running a battery of physical and personality tests. Healthy animals with good temperaments are put up for adoption, Lytton said. “Once there, there is no set time on how long it stays there,” Lytton said. “We try to keep everything as long as we can. We had a cat here over a year ago that was here for 465 days, and she finally got adopted.” Feral animals and overly aggressive animals are likely to be put to sleep first, while dogs with heartworms or other severe health problems, like advanced mange, are also let go, she said. Attempts are made to put older animals, those with minor illnesses and larger breeds like pit bulls into long-term foster families or with animal rescue groups, but the economy has made it hard for even rescue groups to find enough space. “We try,” Lytton said. “A no-kill shelter would be wonderful if it could be done.” Finding space for all the animals Lytton and Caporale agree that starting a successful no-kill shelter would mean expanding the space in the current facility. “Our shelter was built almost 30 years ago … at a time when the population was about half of what it is now,” Caporale said. “You’ve got the same facility serving a population base that’s doubled, and I think people have been trapped into doing what they’ve always done.” The number of animals brought into the shelter varies wildly from day to day, Lytton said — particularly if animal control officers pick up many feral animals. There often is not enough space to house, feed and treat every one, she said. “It’s not unusual that one of the officers goes somewhere and traps 10 to 15 cats in one spot that are all feral,” Lytton said. “One of my officers walked in a few weeks ago and had 27 on her truck that were all feral. But what do you do?” It’s a question that Caporale has thought often about and discussed with several animal rights advocates in the county since starting the no-kill project in earnest nearly two years ago. “I don’t think that anyone realistically expects that we can create a no-kill shelter out of what we have now,” he said. “There’s just too many animals. The real key is to begin to put some money and effort and creativity toward reducing the animal population.” A good place to start would be to examine how the more than $1 million the shelter gets each year from the county is used, Caporale said. “What are we getting for the million bucks?,” he said. “Can we divert some of those resources maybe and get more for the money? We’ve got a lot of inertia to overcome.” ‘It’s a right to life’ Local animal rights advocates say it would be more simple to start a no-kill shelter than people might expect. Kim Bonturi, founder and president of local non-profit organization Chain Free Beaufort, said the steps are clearly spelled out in the book “Redemption” by Nathan Winograd, a leading voice in the no-kill shelter movement. Caporale gave copies of Winograd’s book to all County Council members and other officials several months ago. In part, the book calls on communities to form spay and neuter programs that help control the pet population and keep shelters less full. “In Beaufort County, we’re a rarity nowadays in having a high-kill shelter,” said Bonturi, whose group pushes for laws banning the chaining and tethering of animals. She posts monthly reports from the county animal shelter on their Web site. “Everyone in the country is moving towards no-kill. Statistics show it can be done,” Bonturi said. “There’s no reason why Beaufort County shouldn’t do this.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Humane Education Program!! August 2009 We are happy to announce our new Humane Education Program designed for children in private or public schools, after school programs, Churches and summer camps. This program is a 30 minute hands-on activity designed for children in grades Pre-K to 1st grade. Children are able to learn about the importance of caring for pets, how pets have emotional and physical needs just like humans and what to do if a pet is hurt or in need of help. The curriculum activity plan is aligned with the SC Kindergarten State Standards. This is a perfect opportunity to bring community involvement into your classroom setting. Their is no charge for the public service. Just email us or give us a call so we can share more information about the program. Contact Kelli at 843-597-2153.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Letter from kim Bonturi – January 23, 2008
Chain Free Beaufort’s opinion and perspective of the Beaufort County Council’s Community Services & Public Safety Committee Decision: Keep “Yard Dogs” and Chained Dogs During a 40-minute presentation and discussion at the County Committee meeting there was significant avoidance of facts and data that was presented by Chain Free Beaufort in October. The Committee chair succeeded in burying the proposal for the ordinance to prohibit the chaining and tethering of animals for 3 months which was long enough for Council members to have forgotten the data presented in October. The chair showed YouTube videos of dogs climbing fences and then provided personal testimony and prejudices against individuals who own dogs and treat them like members of their families. There were also denied threats, but threats nonetheless, from the chair of people letting dogs go and the wild dog packs preying on people or dead all over the roads. Dogs were compared to cars and as property and the idea of it being cost prohibitive to have a dog if the ordinance was passed. In an area with considerable property rights attitudes, the dog as property led to the comment of “tying, fencing or in the house it is an individual’s prerogative” with their property. In addition, the perspective that animal cruelty laws are just plain good enough. The argument that rural people all have the homogeneous attitude that “dogs are outside, NOT in the house”, “can’t legislate behavior”, “no one dictates to me what I can do to my dog” and the “to each his own” attitude prevailed. Boogiemen were under every chair in the room ready to leap into our wallets and the specter of dreaded government interference loomed. The generation of ungrounded fear and irrational thought were the order of the meeting. The newly hired Animal Control director’s reinforced comments by McBride that were melodramatic and painted a picture of massive numbers of dogs on the street being picked up and brought to the shelter and overrunning it. With the implied result being that more money would be needed for staff at the shelter and more kennels, runs, space. Regretfully, although with 25 years experience as an Animal Control Officer, recently retired, she has never worked within an area with an ordinance prohibiting chaining so she has no experience in that area. Chain Free Beaufort had provided County Council members with statements from several animal control officers in areas that do have such an ordinance in place that states that this has NOT been the result of such an ordinance. Although expected, it was discouraging that the final decision by the Committee was to take no action in moving the proposed ordinance forward. Despite the fact that the City of Beaufort has put the ordinance into law and the military housing does not permit chaining and tethering. Furthermore, completely un-discussed and/or discarded as not relevant was any issue regarding public safety, links to crime, and the real numbers concerning cost/expense and experiences of areas that have passed the ordinance. Beaufort County population is 142,045 and Animal Control has a budget that includes 6 full-time equivalent Animal Control Officer positions. Beaufort County is setting comfortably. Chatham County (Savannah, GA) passed the ordinance in 8/2005 and with their population of 232,048 and 5 Officers. The whole idea of decreasing animal cruelty through the ordinance was thoroughly lost on the “leadership”. The County Council has been unresponsive to the 3800 supportive signatures on petitions that were presented to them. The decision was based solely on personal opinion and not the wants of their constituents. It is regrettable that a local government elects to ignore the public and fails to make the humane decision. We are shamed by the compassion of our neighboring counties and states that have done the right thing. Chain Free Beaufort will continue on with the fight to speak for those that can not speak for themselves. I just wonder how many more animal cruelty cases or attacks by chained dogs will be added to the books before something is done. Chain Free Beaufort |


